In the Bight of Heligoland

World War 1 Naval Combat

World War 1 Naval Combat

Site Search

Contact Me

Germans Outmanoeuvred and Outfought

Three Cruisers Accounted For

Praise for British submarines

The following was issued as a supplement to the London Gazette:-

Admiralty, October 21, 1914.

The following despatches have been received from Vice-Admiral (Acting) Sir David Beatty, KCB, MVO, DSO, HMS Lion, Rear-Admiral Arthur H Christian, MVO, HMS Euryalus, Commodore Reginald Y Tyrwhitt, Commodore (T), HMS Arethusa, and Commodore roger J B Keyes, CB, MVO, Commodore (S), reporting the engagement off Heligoland on Friday 28th August.

A memorandum by the director of the air Department, Admiralty, is annexed.

HMS Lion, September 1, 1914.

Sir, I have the honour to report that on Thursday 27th august at 5 a.m., I proceeded with the first Battle Cruiser Squadron and first light Cruiser Squadron in company, to rendezvous with the Rear-Admiral, Invincible.

At 4 a.m., 28th August, the movements of the flotillas commenced as previously arranged, the Battle Cruiser Squadron and Light Cruiser Squadron supporting. The Rear-Admiral, Invincible, with New Zealand and four destroyers having joined my flag, the Squadron passed through the prearranged rendezvous.

At 8.10 a.m. I received a signal from the Commodore (T), informing me that the Flotilla was in action with the enemy. This was presumably in the vicinity of their prearranged rendezvous. From this time until 11 a.m. I remained about the vicinity ready to support as necessary, intercepting various signals, which contained no information on which I could act.

At 11 a.m. the Squadron was attacked by three Submarines. The attack was frustrated by rapid manoeuvring, and the four Destroyers were ordered to attack them. Shortly after 11 a.m. various signals having been received indicating that the Commodore (T) and Commodore (S) were both in need of assistance, I ordered the Light Cruiser Squadron to support the Torpedo Flotillas.

Later I received a signal from Commodore (T), stating that he was being attacked by a large Cruiser, and a further signal informing me that he was being hard pressed and asking for assistance. The Captain (D), first flotilla, also signalled that he was in need of help.

From the foregoing the situation appeared to me critical. the flotillas had advanced only ten miles since 8 a.m., and were only about twenty-five miles from two enemy bases, on their flank and rear respectively. Commodore Goodenough had detached two Light Cruisers to assist some Destroyers earlier in the day, and these had not yet rejoined. (They rejoined at 2.30 p.m.) As the reports indicated the presence of many enemy ships -one a large cruiser - I considered that his force might not be strong enough to deal with the situation sufficiently rapidly, so at 11.30 a.m. the Battle Cruisers turned to ESE and worked up to full speed. It was evident that to be of any value the support must be overwhelming and carried out at the highest speed possible.

I had not lost sight of the risk of Submarines, and possible sortie in force from the enemy's base, especially in view of the mist to the south-east.

Our high speed, however made submarine attack difficult, and the smoothness of the seas made their detection comparatively easy. I considered that we were powerful enough to deal with any sortie except by a Battle Squadron, which was unlikely to come out in time, provided our stroke was sufficiently rapid.

At 12.15 p.m. Fearless and the First Flotilla were sighted retiring west. At the same time the Light Cruiser Squadron was observed to be engaging an enemy ship ahead. They appeared to have her beat.

I then steered NE to the sounds of firing ahead, and at 12.30 p.m. sighted Arethusa and Third Flotilla retiring to the westward engaging a Cruiser of the Kolberg class on our port bow. I steered to cut her off from Heligoland, and at 12.37 p.m. opened fire. At 12.42 the enemy turned to NE, and we chased at 27 knots.

At 12.56 p.m. sighted and engaged a two-funnelled Cruiser ahead. Lion fired two salvos at her, which took effect, and she disappeared in the mist, burning furiously and in a sinking condition. in view of the mist and that she was steering at high speed at right angles to lion, who was herself at 28 knots, the lion's firing was very creditable.

Our destroyers had reported the presence of floating mines to the eastward and I considered it inadvisable to pursue her. It was essential that the Squadrons should remain concentrated, and I accordingly ordered a withdrawal. The Battle Cruisers turned north and circled to port to complete the destruction of the first vessel engaged. She was sighted again at 1.25 p.m. steaming SE with colours still flying. Lion opened fire with two turrets, and at 1.35 p.m., after receiving two salvos, she sank.

The four attached Destroyers were sent to pick up survivors, but I deeply regret that they subsequently searched the area but found none.

At 1.40 p.m. the Battle Cruisers turned to the northward, and Queen Mary was again attacked by a submarine. The attack was avoided by the use of the helm. Lowestoft was also unsuccessfully attacked. The Battle Cruisers covered the retirement until nightfall. By 6 p.m., the retirement having been well executed and all Destroyers accounted for, I altered course, spread the Light Cruisers, and swept northwards in accordance with the Commander-in-Chief's orders. At 7.45 p.m. I detached Liverpool to Rosyth with German prisoners, 7 officers and 79 men, survivors from Mainz. no further incident occurred.

I have the honour to be, Sir

Your obedient Servant,

David Beatty, Vice-Admiral.

Copyright ©1998-2017